Table of Content
In what follows, we explain some of the values and norms that are important for an ethical evaluation of physical restraint in nursing homes. With regard to the implementation of evidence-based practice, we have to take into consideration the role of nursing leadership. Effective leadership is vital in this process as well as the institution and the culture in which the leader operates . Current evidence shows the relationship between positive relational leadership and lower physical restraint use . Leaders can facilitate working conditions, create an atmosphere of open communication with staff and promote positive relationships among nurses in order to ensure safe, high-quality patient care and work engagement . These components seem to be equally important to successfully reduce physical restraints.
The resident also should have the right to refuse chemical restraints even if their doctor or the institution strongly recommends them. If the resident cannot decide for themselves, their health-care proxy should not give consent for the drugs to be used for convenience. Sullivan‐Marx E M, Strumpf N E, Evans L E.et al Predictors of continued physical restraint use in nursing home residents following restraint reduction efforts. In what follows we outline the clinical state of the art concerning physical restraint use among older people. Restraints can never be used for punishment or a nursing home’s convenience.
Data analysis
Though the risks of these dangerous drugs are well known, many facilities continue to prescribe them unnecessarily, along with a host of other medications, making them even more dangerous. Chemical restraints are known to cause damage to the heart and cardiovascular system, an increased risk of falls, loss of mobility, and memory loss. Nursing home neglect is actions, or inactions, that occur when staff members fail to provide the appropriate care to their residents. Unlike abuse, which is a deliberate act of negligence, neglect can happen whether staff members intend to commit the act or not. This is true of physical restraints, because staff members who physically restrain residents can injure them without intending to do so. An important red flag to keep an eye out for is the use of physical restraints.
She primarily writes content for health-related websites, but has also written test prep materials, white papers, court documents, and more. She also teaches anatomy and physiology at the college level for the National Institutes of Health, as well as at the general public level in yoga teacher training programs. Kirkevold Ø, Sandvik L, Engedal K. Use of constraints and their correlates in Norwegian nursing homes. As a first value, we could state that every senior citizen should be treated as a person.
What Are Physical Restraints?
Physical restraints are considered any physical methods that a staff member uses to restrain the resident. Staff members can use physical devices like hand mitts or leg restraints to keep residents from moving freely. In some circumstances, using objects to lock a resident inside of their room can be considered a physical restraint.
However, if the nursing home staff member administers medication as a way to sedate or control the resident’s behavior, it may be considered abuse or even a crime. Feelings of guilt can be combated by, as far as possible, involving the relatives directly in a caring process that aims at the avoidance of physical restraint. Moreover, the mere presence of older people's relatives can already serve to prevent physical restraint.2 This inclusion in the care process can heighten the feeling, for both older persons and their relatives, that the situation is a meaningful one. Of course, it goes without saying that relatives must be able to choose freely whether or not they want to participate in the caring process. Management personnel must develop an ethical view with respect to physical restraint.
Clinical‐ethical decision making
Staff members may view residents with mental issues, such as dementia, to be difficult and the use of restraints makes it easier to deal with these individuals. Using restraints for these reasons is illegal and nursing homes should be held accountable for it. For example, a doctor may think it is necessary to use physical restraints if a resident who is already at a high risk of falling is disoriented from medication. In this case, the resident may need to be restrained to ensure that she does not attempt to walk on her own. Physical restraints are anything attached to or near a resident’s body that they cannot easily control or remove, and that are intended to prevent them from moving freely.
Many experience anxiety, increased agitation, and even terror with the implementation of physical restraints. Though restraints are often used to prevent patients from suffering injuries, research shows these are not safe. They don’t actually decrease the risk of injury, but instead lead to increased emotional and physical suffering.
The doctor may also review the medications that the resident is taking before determining whether physical restraints are needed. Like with chemical restraints, psychotropic drugs cannot be administered legally without a doctor’s order, who in turn must have the consent of the patient or their family. When a new drug is prescribed to your loved one, it’s important to understand the medical reason for the drug in addition to its dosage and any potential risks. Make sure to get as much information as you can from a medical professional before approving the use of a new drug. Antipsychotics are the most frequently used chemical restraint, and are often prescribed to residents with dementia.
They are not allowed to use physical restraints on residents as a form of punishment. This article has dealt with two problems related to the physical restraint of older persons. First, there is sufficient empirical evidence to support the idea that, in many cases, physical restraint causes more harm than benefit. In addition, the application of physical restraint often goes together with a disproportionate infringement of the principle of respect for the autonomy of older people.
Thus, a relation between nursing practice regarding physical restraints and cultural background is likely. Our study revealed no difference in the prevalence between the German-speaking and the French-speaking part of Switzerland. The enactment of the new Swiss-wide law in 2013 might have minimized any differences in the use of physical restraints.
Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site. Vassallo M, Wilkinson C, Stockdale R.et al Attitudes to restraint for the prevention of falls in hospital. Newbern V, Lindsey I. Attitudes of wives toward having their elderly husband restrained. For a 59-year-old resident who developed multiple painful and infected bedsores which took four years to heal.
ANew York Timesanalysis of Medicare data found that one in nine patients had been diagnosed with schizophrenia, even though the rate of schizophrenia in the general population is one in 150 people. The Times concluded that doctors were falsely diagnosing patients with schizophrenia to be able to prescribe drugs for convenience. Chemical restraints are “any form of psychoactive medication used not to treat illness, but to intentionally inhibit a particular behavior or movement,” according to theCollege of Nurses of Ontario. Marquette Elder’s Advisor’s definition of chemical restraints does not limit the description to psychoactive drugs but instead includes any drugs that institutions use primarily for discipline or convenience.
No comments:
Post a Comment